HTA dossier development
We bring together clinical effectiveness, safety and value evidence around an appropriate local comparator, in a form assessors can review.
Registration answers whether your product may be sold. We help you prepare the evidence authorities use when they assess whether it should be funded.
Kenya's Social Health Insurance Act 2023 established a new health-financing framework. Coverage is organised through the Primary Healthcare Fund, the Social Health Insurance Fund, and the Emergency, Chronic and Critical Illness Fund.
The Benefits Package and Tariffs Advisory Panel advises the Ministry of Health and the Social Health Authority on benefits and tariffs, informed by health technology assessment.
Read the Ministry of Health announcementRegistration and funding are separate decisions. This is a conceptual pathway, not a guarantee that a particular product will pass each stage.
A product outside the benefits package may compete on out-of-pocket price against a funded alternative. Planning for the evidence behind access decisions belongs alongside the regulatory strategy.
We review the clinical and economic evidence, identify what is missing and help you prepare for discussions with the relevant authorities.
We bring together clinical effectiveness, safety and value evidence around an appropriate local comparator, in a form assessors can review.
We use Kenyan cost and disease data to model cost-effectiveness, then estimate what inclusion could cost the relevant fund over an agreed period.
We help you prepare for discussions with the Ministry of Health, SHA and the panel secretariat, including what evidence needs to be ready and when.
Kenya's HTA process is new and still taking shape. We work with the process as it currently operates, and we will tell you plainly what is established and what is not.
BPTAP now publishes an intervention-proposal form. A proposal is distinct from a guaranteed product listing or funding decision. View the official proposal channel.
A coherent evidence base spans clinical, economic and operational questions. The requirements for an individual intervention depend on the assessment and available evidence.
Begin with feasibility, build the evidence, and support engagement and the review that follows.
We review the evidence you have and identify what is still needed before a submission can be considered.
Deliverable: a feasibility opinion and evidence gap register.
We agree the comparator, build the model and source the local data needed to close the evidence gaps.
Deliverable: a completed economic model and dossier draft.
We help you prepare the dossier and support the agreed discussions and submission process.
Deliverable: a final dossier and an engagement record.
We help you answer questions and keep the evidence in order while the review continues.
Review questions and follow-through support.